Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:08:32 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: lib/pam problems... Message-ID: <20041026170831.GB40348@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20041026160137.GA31869@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041026024356.GA96981@thought.org> <20041026035437.GA30968@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041026045647.GA97200@thought.org> <20041026072623.GA64337@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041026073850.GA97684@thought.org> <20041026160137.GA31869@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:01:37AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:38:50AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:26:23AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > Is your xdm linked to stale (FreeBSD 4.x) libraries? > > > > > > > > Can you humour me and run a ldd on the xdm binary? > > > > > Hm, ahhh, maybe... (!) sure... > > > > root@sartre:/etc# ldd `which xdm` > > /usr/X11R6/bin/xdm: > > libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x2808c000) > > libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x2809a000) > > libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x280af000) > > libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x280f9000) > > libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x28102000) > > libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28119000) > > libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28127000) > > libXau.so.0 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 (0x281e5000) > > libXdmcp.so.0 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXdmcp.so.0 (0x281e8000) > > libpam.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpam.so.1 (0x281ec000) > > libcrypt.so.2 => /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x281f6000) > > libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x2820e000) > > libutil.so.3 => /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28211000) > > libxpg4.so.3 => /usr/lib/libxpg4.so.3 (0x2821a000) > > libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x2821c000) > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Thought so..that's a 4.x binary. You can't mix 4.x binaries and 5.x > libraries, which is why you're getting the PAM failure from dlopen(). > Rebuild it. > > Kris Rats! I started fresh with my 5.2 CD then upgraded to (I thought) RELENG_5, but ended up building 4.whatever. On my third try i rebuilt using an explicit _5_3 and got 5.3-RELEASE #2. tHere are fewer than 30 ports on my devel box. Would you recommend I portupgrade -fa everything?? you're a gentleman and a scholar, Kris. gary PS: FWIW, my upgrade script did a portclean to get rid of old libs, &c. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026170831.GB40348>