Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:04:16 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Zoltan Frombach <zoltan@frombach.com> Subject: Re: Portupgrade -af question Message-ID: <20041027190416.GA70873@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20041027173212.GA59754@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <BAY2-DAV3ExvWvqzAoa0000c9e7@hotmail.com> <20041027173212.GA59754@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:32:12AM -0700, Kris Kennaway typed:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:26:49AM -0700, Zoltan Frombach wrote:
>
> > >You can omit step 8 by editing /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. e.g.
> > >
> > > MAKE_ARGS = {
> > > 'lang/perl5.8' => 'WITH_THREADS=yes',
> > > }
> >
> > In fact, I do have those compile options set in my
> > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file. But are you sure that portupgrade will
> > use those even when called with the -P flag ( eg: portupgrade -af -P )?
>
> Such environment variables have no effect on pkg_add (i.e. portupgrade
> -P), because the package has already been compiled and its build
> options were set at that time.
Yes. Wouldn't it be a nice feature for "portupgrade -P" to install the port
instead of the package if any non-defaults were defined in pkgtools.conf?
(I guess now's the time for me to learn some ruby)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041027190416.GA70873>