Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:45:09 +0100
From:      Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        clement@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: apache-2.0.52_2 port is broken ?!!
Message-ID:  <20041031114509.37a4d578.clement@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041031092320.GA74401@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <BAY2-DAV10Px33E1ioW0001fd36@hotmail.com> <20041031092320.GA74401@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:23:20 +0000
Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:

> Looks like the maintainer (CC'd) left some stuff commented out in the
> port Makefile which should have been uncommented.
don't ask why :-)
 
> --- Makefile.orig	Sun Oct 31 09:13:29 2004
> +++ Makefile	Sat Oct 30 21:54:36 2004
<snip patch> 
> This does cause the configure step to generate a number of warnings,
> but otherwise compilation proceeds as normal.
I shouldn't have commit Makefile changes, it was only for testing purpose.
I've just committed a fix.

Sorry for the noise guys !

clem

--Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBhMI1sRhfjwcjuh0RAp8QAJ9PGLz/d08XJqxOQX9Wj1BKBPoW+QCfWeQ0
pTm7asbKF2MrYDXNP3jiILY=
=9E1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041031114509.37a4d578.clement>