Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:10:25 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Paulo <l1@npf.deec.uc.pt> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the best graphicscard for FreeBSD Message-ID: <200411301010.27057.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200411301008.21406.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <51611.192.168.0.200.1101398532.squirrel@192.168.0.200> <41AC3509.40809@npf.pt.freebsd.org> <200411301008.21406.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart4036987.G6KM5e0duz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 30. November 2004 10:08, Michael Nottebrock wrote: I shouldn't edit around in my replies so much. I meant to say: > Well, that's exactly the reason "why not freebsd". I didn't know research > labs these days choose the software they're working with based on what=20 the software could do instead of what it actually can do (right now). =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart4036987.G6KM5e0duz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBrDkDXhc68WspdLARAmDgAJ9lG6TSaVQSC7NpSMWljYRNQzP8bACfR+Vh OqCiOGNNEo+agnhVDi5KkmQ= =0GUi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4036987.G6KM5e0duz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411301010.27057.michaelnottebrock>