Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:57:12 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Subject: Re: Why do we have both ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu? Message-ID: <41D3DF08.2000207@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <20041230104323.GA44922@FreeBSD.org> References: <20041229222343.GA71433@dragon.nuxi.com> <41D3BA59.9060505@redesjm.local> <20041230104323.GA44922@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eivind Eklund wrote: >On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:20:41AM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > >>David O'Brien wrote: >> >> >> >>>What's the difference between ghostscript-gpl and ghostscript-gnu? A >>>diff of their Makefile's doesn't make it any clearer. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Versions. >>It was after a change in licence from the originator. >> >> > >According to the pkg-descr, these should both be the same (the GNU GPL). > > > No. The originator licenses are different. go there for answers. >>-gnu must remain at 7.x and unmaintained. >>-gpl is the new 8.x source distribution. >> >> > >Please add this information to pkg-descr. > >In general, whenever somebody copy a port - MAKE SURE BOTH pkg-descr FILES >DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENCES. (This is a general plea - we've got maybe a hundred >duplicates, and they're annoying.) > >Eivind. > > Will work, time permiting, but the original repocopy/patch is not mine. -- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41D3DF08.2000207>