Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:21:48 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Lost interrupts on SMP systems Message-ID: <200501111621.48893.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200501111023.10921.pvtrifonov@mail.ru> References: <E1CnCIt-000A3p-00.pvtrifonov-mail-ru@mx2.mail.ru> <200501101448.30841.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200501111023.10921.pvtrifonov@mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 02:23 am, Peter Trifonov wrote: > Hello John, > > On Monday 10 January 2005 22:48, John Baldwin wrote: > > Ok. What if you apply both patches, does that do better? (Your fix was > > correct btw, so just apply the previous patch to what you have now.) > > Things became even worse with both patches. Now doing normal (not flood) > ping over EITHER xl1 OR xl2 (they share IRQ11) causes the corresponding > interface to say "watchdog timeout". Essentially, xl1 and xl2 do not work > at all now. > > mptable still reports the same stuff as it was on the original (unpatched) > kernel > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-smp/2005-January/000700.html) Ok, can you get me the dmesg from a boot -v with both patches still? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501111621.48893.jhb>