Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:16:03 -0800 (PST) From: Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com> To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: same to the ports/51632 PR but in Xorg 6.8.1 Message-ID: <20050123231603.91896.qmail@web14823.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <200501232317.17851.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> wrote: > On Sunday 23 of January 2005 22:50, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > --- Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> wrote: > > > On Sunday 23 of January 2005 18:45, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > Hello there. > > > > > > > > I use FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 with current ports. No metter what > locale > > > > > > I've > > > > > > > set, when I run 'xterm -lc &' I see following message in the new > xterm > > > > window: > > > > > > > > Warning: could not change ownership of tty -- pty is insecure! > > > > > > > > This is the same problem described in the ports/51632 PR about > XFree86 > > > > version of luit(1). Could you please fix it in the Xorg 6.8.1 port > too? > > > > > > The same fix is already there. To quote a message from xorg-clients > port: > > > > > > If you want to use xterm with locales in a secure manner, luit must > be > > > installed setuid. If you want to do this, hit Ctrl-C now and use > > > "make WITH_SETUID_LUIT=yes" > > > > Thank you very much for quick response and this explanation. I didn't > see > > that message from xorg-clients port because instead of building each > part > > of the Xorg ports collection separately I builded and installed the > X.Org > > distribution metaport wich have xorg-clients as a dependecy. If > > WITH_SETUID_LUIT could be set during 'make config' I was never missed > this > > configuration option. What do you think about making the > WITH_SETUID_LUIT > > so? > > You mean converting X11 ports to use OPTIONS? Yes, exactly. > Hmm. Right now I'm a bit sceptical about this - there appear to be some > trouble with using this stuff and as far as I know a better framework > is being worked on and I wanted to wait for that to become available > before I try playing with this. What troubles OPTIONS use could make? What is this new framework and where can I read more about it? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050123231603.91896.qmail>