Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:21:08 -0500 (EST) From: Darren Henderson <darren@nighttide.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: They reply ALL button !!!!!!!!!!!!! Message-ID: <20050129200454.O34189@olmec> In-Reply-To: <20050127174851.GA72365@alexis.mi.celestial.com> References: <ef60af09050126235754d4e313@mail.gmail.com> <20050127174851.GA72365@alexis.mi.celestial.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Bill Campbell wrote: > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I wish this site wasn't referred to as a response to this question when it comes up. All of its arguments are based in personal opinion, opinion formed around using elm. To quote the ports description of elm-2.5.6_2, "A once-popular mail user agent...". Most moderately modern mailers cope with reply-to just fine. Use of the reply-to header, IMO, is related to the list type. If you intend the list to be an inclusive discussion and wish to encourage that then by all means include it even though Mr. Rosenthal finds it arrogant - its not his list. Given the volume of messages in questions its probably not the best choice for this list. -Darren ______________________________________________________________________ Darren Henderson darren@nighttide.net Help fight junk e-mail, visit http://www.cauce.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050129200454.O34189>