Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:06:30 +0000
From:      Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.x concerns
Message-ID:  <3aaaa3a050210060675cf1d7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050208002923.GA83862@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20050207101634.8716616A569@hub.freebsd.org> <20050207212024.H27037@zero> <20050208002923.GA83862@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If this helps, I noticed this recently on the machine that has had tcp lockups.

rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type c49b flags 3 len 47956 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 98b4 flags 3 len 17725 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 8be6 flags 3 len 38514 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 5c60 flags 3 len 2270 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type a338 flags 3 len 58392 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 8680 flags 3 len 22762 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 2ffa flags 3 len 61086 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fc52 flags 3 len 55028 > max 1514)

It is still online tho.

Chris


On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:29:23 -0800, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:40:48PM -0200, T?rgan Flores de Siqueira wrote:
> > >On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +0000, Chris wrote:
> > >
> > >>4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
> > >>worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
> > >>libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
> > >>adjust, now we have a situation where most stuff that worked in 4.x
> > >>worked well in 5.1 and 5.2.1 but then broke in 5.3 so effectively 5.3
> > >>was liek a new major version over 5.2.1.
> > >
> > >5.2.1 was clearly marked as a "developer preview" release and you were
> > >warned not to rely on it for production use.  As a snapshot of
> > >FreeBSD-CURRENT, binary compatibility is not guaranteed and often
> > >needs to be broken in the course of development.
> > >
> > >Kris
> >
> > Just adding a note: I regularly use FreeBSD on a Toshiba notebook, and
> > switched from 4.x to 5.x to benefit from cardbus support.
> > Well, I started with 5.2.1 and all things did well. Since then, I'm
> > trying to track 5-STABLE with no success. Starting with 5.3-RELEASE,
> > the ACPI stopped to work, as well as did the rl driver.
> > So, I switched back to 5.2.1.
> 
> Sorry to hear that - I hope you submitted bug reports so that someone
> can try to fix this, otherwise you might be stuck with 5.2.1 forever.
> 
> Kris
> 
> 
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a050210060675cf1d7>