Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:22:59 +0100 From: Hexren <me@hexren.net> To: Odhiambo Washington <wash@wananchi.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Please test: MPSAFE callouts Message-ID: <72456382.20050226122259@hexren.net> In-Reply-To: <20050225164156.GC43437@ns2.wananchi.com> References: <200502211852.01792.max@love2party.net> <200502251734.08309.max@love2party.net> <20050225164156.GC43437@ns2.wananchi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OW> * Max Laier <max@love2party.net> [20050225 19:34]: wrote: >> On Monday 21 February 2005 18:51, Max Laier wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > Pyun reminded me that we are still useing Giant to protect our callouts. We >> > don't have to since we protect our code in there with our own mutex and the >> > netstack is Giant-free as well now (provided that mpsafenet is enabled). >> > >> > If you have testing capabilities, please take the attached diffs for a ride >> > (on SMP hardware) with debug.mpsafenet=1 and MPSAFE NICs. It'd be great if >> > we could enable it for 5.4R, but we need proper testing to do so! >> > >> > NOTE: If you use user/group rules you still need to set debug.mpsafenet=0, >> > but testing of this scenario is welcome as well. >> > >> > Thanks in advance for your feedback! >> >> Has anyone even cared enough to compile this? C'mon it's not that hard and we >> really need some feedback! OW> I don't have an SMP hardware otherwise I could have tried ;) --------------------------------------------- For showing that I actually read what is postet here ;) Me too :(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72456382.20050226122259>