Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:40 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour <ante@Update.UU.SE> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mbsd@pacbell.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xwrapper doesn't use .xinitrc, or does it? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503211013020.5467@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> In-Reply-To: <20050320163928.H693@antec.home> References: <20050320221930.GA11100@fan.priv.at> <20050320163928.H693@antec.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---293463789-1718851445-1111396480=:5467 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Mikko Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Andreas Davour wrote: > >> I have just rebuilt my system and a few things aren't as they used to be= =2E=20 >> When I try to start X with Xwrapper no xterms or other windows appear.= =20 >> Isn't Xwrapper starting the stuff in .xinitrc like "startx" used to do f= or=20 >> me (but wont do, since it no longer has the authority to do so)?? >>=20 >> Isn't there some documentation for Xwrapper somewhere? > > You want startx(1). The .xinitrc file is read by "xinit", btw. I used to start X using startx. Now it doesn't work for anybody but=20 root. Of course I can set "the bit" on the X image, but I guessed there=20 was a reason somebody invented Xwrapper. /andreas --=20 A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ---293463789-1718851445-1111396480=:5467--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.62.0503211013020.5467>