Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:10:16 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mplayer/mplayer-plugin question Message-ID: <426AD5D8.5060907@kutulu.org> In-Reply-To: <200504240018.08315.danny@ricin.com> References: <20050420155742.GA83965@thought.org> <op.spo826yp9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20050423212902.29985d3c.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200504240018.08315.danny@ricin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Danny Pansters wrote: > Of course that is if people _WANT_ to do away with the X prefix, up until now > my impression was that most folks didn't mind it or even thought it was > better. I never really cared very much about it apart from aestetic [sp?] > reasons, but I can certainly imagine it being confusing to some (new) users. I have always historically liked having a /usr/local and /usr/X11R6. If I converted a machine to headless, such as retiring a workstation into a backup MX or such, rm -rf /usr/X11R6 was always clean and easy, and cleared up tons of space. Even now, it's annoying that KDE puts its stuff one place and GNOME puts it stuff somewhere else. I'd rather have it all in /usr/X11R6 -- anything GUI related in one place that I can both mentally and physically segregate. Having said all that, I admit this is mostly inertia from before decent packaging systems existed. I'm used to immediately going into /usr/X11R6 to find the configuration data for my UI, but as mentioned, KDE's already screwing that up for me :) And removing the GUI is as easy as pkg_delete -r imake*, so I think moving forward, there's no significant technical reason to keep a separate prefix. -- -- Mike Still using IE? Get Firefox! http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=6492&t=1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426AD5D8.5060907>