Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:05:21 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: screen-4.0.2_1 Message-ID: <20050430220520.GC52286@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <005301c54dce$14ee2400$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> References: <20050430213556.GA51804@xor.obsecurity.org> <005301c54dce$14ee2400$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:46:32PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >=20 > >>So I assume that's why it was removed but tbh I haven't had this happen= =20 > >>since > >>5.1 days and removing the package is therefore a pain and should be put > >>back IMO. > >From: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> > > > >The bug still exists as far as anyone knows. The reason you haven't > >seen it happen is because you're no longer using the package. >=20 > All our installs are done via pxe using a custom install.cfg which just > has a sudo package with dependencies to all the base packages we require > including screen and not as single machine has had an issue since 5.1 > but maybe thats just me. I know for certain that the problem existed after 5.1 (I only added the NO_PACKAGE tag less than a year ago), so I guess you're just lucky. No-one ever tracked down the circumstances that caused the package to go into a spin anyway. Kris --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCdAEgWry0BWjoQKURAq4eAJ9GT1BjWfJhZ5t47Pr/HDzTXM5TqgCaAoRX yeIyH5C2wwMbRIfd79UQCm8= =zUK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050430220520.GC52286>