Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:54:00 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: hellmuth.michaelis@t-online.de Cc: Marcus Franke <Marcus.Franke@gmx.net>, freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Asterisk on FreeBSD + ISDN BRI Message-ID: <200505262154.01790.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <20050526183150.D613D11876@bert.int.kts.org> References: <20050526183150.D613D11876@bert.int.kts.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 26 May 2005 20:31, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > The only problem I see is that the official version of I4B doesn't > > support an alert phase: calls must be either accepted or rejected. > > Then have another look and you will find that alerting is supported. > Besides that i don't see this an item why it would not be possible > to get asterisk support for i4b. "/dev/i4b" supports alerting OK, but "/dev/i4btelXXX" doesn't. And if you want to get sound-data from a call, one has to do something similar to what "isdnphone" does, right? And then comes the problem "/dev/i4btelXXX" can only work as an answering machine or dial out. There is no "ringing" signal from "/dev/i4bteldXXX" so that "isdnphone" can decide whether to accept a call or not, and not just "isdnd". If one does it properly multiple configurations (cep's) in isdnd should be allowed to compete for a call. Then it should be possible to set up an answering machine in addition to "isdnphone". So it would have been nice if you could have had a look at my code to see how I implemented it, so that we don't end up incompatible. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505262154.01790.hselasky>