Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:22:06 -0500 From: "Edwin L. Culp" <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: courier Message-ID: <20050528132206.kzgwiqxhk4k0s8wg@mail.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20050528072542.oybo3q7dz4swog4w@mail.encontacto.net> References: <20050524204635.5fbdf4b3.dick@nagual.st> <200505250604.59120.milan.obuch@netlabplus.sk> <200505250838.29311.ports@dino.sk> <20050528072542.oybo3q7dz4swog4w@mail.encontacto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "Edwin L. Culp" <eculp@encontacto.net>: > Quoting Milan Obuch <ports@dino.sk>: > >> On Wednesday 25 May 2005 06:04, Milan Obuch wrote: >>> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 20:46, dick hoogendijk wrote: >>> > Any ideas how long it'll take until a new courier package will come out? >>> > I'm running courier mailer on 4.11-stable, but cannot install it on my >>> > 5.4-release because it's broken. That's not nice. I don't want to learn >>> > another mailer. So, will it be much longer? any info on this? >>> >>> Try attached unofficial 0.50.0 port. It compiles for me :) I did not >>> evaluate functionality however. I am using in production 0.49.0 version >>> without issue (attached too). I would like to see courier port updated too >>> - please test them and share your experiences. >>> Milan I just did my last 0.45.4 upgrade. I was so smooth that I wish I had another one to do ;) Thanks again for such a great job. I hope this can be committed shortly. Now I'm going to upgrade my 0.49 manually compiled courier mail servers, with fam. ed > Milan and Yarema, > > I still had two machines that needed upgrading to 50.0 from the old > FreeBSD courier-ldap-0.45.4 port and decided to try it even though > I've grown acustomed to having to complile my own. I decided to try > it on one of them. It is up and running perfectly, only about 1/2 > hour, but seems solid and stable. BTW the really AWESOME part is I > didn't have to make any configuration changes, except to authldaprc > and authdaemonrc and the respective changes in rc.conf for > courier_authdaemond_enable that are now seperate and in > /usr/local/etc/authlib and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond.sh > but that is a no-brainer. Gonna do the other one tomorrow, if I find > time. > > As you may remember, I have fam running on all my manually compiled > courier .49 and .50 installations. Is it going to be used on > FreeBSD? Is it beneficial? > > As a courier user, I can no see no reason to not commit the port as > is. Thanks for all the work you guys have put into this. I think I > like the seperate ports approach that you are taking rather than the > megaport. Easier to upgrade the pieces. > > Have a great weekend, > > ed > >> >> Argh, no attachments here :( >> Download them from http://ports.dino.sk >> Milan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050528132206.kzgwiqxhk4k0s8wg>