Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:33:52 -0500
From:      Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, fjoe@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why was wxgtk removed?
Message-ID:  <20050601143351.GA59325@nowhere>
In-Reply-To: <20050531224841.GB33258@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20050531175246.GA55256@nowhere> <20050531224841.GB33258@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:48:41PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:52:46PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> > What happened to the wxgtk port?  I was just about to update the
> > Audacity port to use the GTK1 version of wxgtk as it seems to be a lot
> > more stable, but it's been removed.
> 
> Check the CVS commit logs.

Well, okay, that was the first thing I did, but here we go:

------------------
CVS log for ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk/Attic/Makefile
Changes since 1.47: +1 -1 lines
FILE REMOVED

Finish repo copy of wxgtk 2.4.2 ports to wxgtk24*
-------------------

Following that chain:

------------------
CVS log for ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk24/Makefile
Changes since 1.47: +6 -48 lines

Finish repo copy of wxgtk 2.4.2 ports to wxgtk24*
-------------------

Unless I'm missing something, that doesn't really explain why
pre-repo-copy wxgtk ports supported both GTK1 and GTK2, but
post-repo-copy the GTK1 support has been removed.

Yes, I know that GTK1 is considered obsolete, but unfortunately not all
outside software has caught up (and GTK 1.2 _is_ still in the ports
tree).

Before you ask, Audacity has been promising full GTK2 support for quite
a while now, but it still hasn't happened.  As it is, it _sort of_ works
but isn't really stable (try double-clicking on the track menu a few
times quickly and enjoy the nice sig11).

The sad part of it all is that wx is SUPPOSED to be toolkit-independent.

I'm more than willing to do the work of putting together a wx/GTK1 slave
port if it would be accepted.  However if there was a good reason it was
removed I don't want to step on anybody's toes...

Thanks,
Craig



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050601143351.GA59325>