Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:40:23 -0400 From: Scott Robbins <scottro@nyc.rr.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: glxgears Message-ID: <20050603004023.GB65314@mail.scottro.net> In-Reply-To: <200506022029.34544.ckleski@mbc.edu> References: <200506022029.34544.ckleski@mbc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:29:34PM +0000, Craig Kleski wrote: > After moving from -stable to -current recently, I noticed that glxgears > is more than 50% faster in -current. My kernel options have not > changed, and it's not dri (i915 doesn't work yet). Has anyone else > noticed a similar speed increases in X? Any idea why? VERY VERY subjective answer, yes, CURRENT seems snappier as has been said before. (I was using ULE and PREEMPTION in 5.4) (However, I have some cheap onboard video card, using the via driver). Things like frozen bubble for instance, just seem snappier, even on this low-end machine, 1.2 gig processor 512 megs DDR vs my main 5.4 workstation, 3 gig processor, a gig of DDR. Again, very subjective--both machines are lightly loaded, really just workstations. - -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: You're like my fairy godmother, and Santa Claus, and Q all wrapped up into one. (they look at her) Q from Bond, not Star Trek. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCn6b3+lTVdes0Z9YRArN/AJ0dDeHgRipr/wnW61X4nZXOwlYXqQCfbrFN ychAKoi7SIEeS1QH5kTul5Y= =or/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050603004023.GB65314>