Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:43:55 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/82086: openh323 and pwlib very out of date Message-ID: <1118436235.7847.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050610204200.GA526@energistic.com> References: <200506101930.j5AJUQcO071359@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050610204200.GA526@energistic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steve Ames p=ED=B9e v p=E1 10. 06. 2005 v 15:42 -0500: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:30:26PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Synopsis: openh323 and pwlib very out of date > >=20 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > > State-Changed-By: pav > > State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 10 19:29:52 GMT 2005 > > State-Changed-Why:=20 > > Could you create an unified diffs between existing and your ports and s= end it > > to me? >=20 > See attached diffs.=20 Please, diff -ruN (unified, and include new and deleted files). > I would also like to create ports for the newer versions > of pwlib and openh323 but perhaps in a different port such as >=20 > pwlib-janus > pwlib-pandora > openh323-janus > openh323-pandora How does these relate to existing pwlib and openh323? Are they API incompatible, or are they forks, or...? --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> Squish. Larger than the normal icky things, and twice as icky. --=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqfuLntdYP8FOsoIRAivTAJ4td5ze+lPSdPqHHIShCMsA5zXIsQCfXUNh OgzuSwgdqmrpjk2GZWyvf1A= =Vf9Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1118436235.7847.7.camel>