Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:26:26 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem Message-ID: <20050613212626.GC6385@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050613192423.GC4323@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua> <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org> <20050613192423.GC4323@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:24:23PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the 5.4 > > > > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't contain > > > > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs. > > > > > > This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile. > >=20 > > That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can have= =20 > > this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead of= =20 > > the base dist? >=20 > Agreed, it would be nice to have more granularity in our install bits. > =20 OK, I will do it (modulo the sysinstall part). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCrfoBqRfpzJluFF4RAjzfAJ46Hea4ogItna6bRAPdog9YxMiT9ACfaYyK /qCfSoRQhEQRxPUtWGtRcLU= =Rgpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050613212626.GC6385>