Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Jun 2005 21:37:11 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.0-Current and gcc 4.x
Message-ID:  <20050619043711.GB46516@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050618162922.GE55448@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <42B409A7.5020909@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050618162922.GE55448@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 09:29:23AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 01:46:47PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > As I see in the sources, FreeBSD 6.0-Current is still based on gcc 
> > 3.4.4. I think due to code freezing this version will be the platform 
> > compiler when 6.0-RELEASE comes out. Are there any plans using a more 
> > recent version of gcc, like 4.0 or 4.1? On some lists I read something 
> > about better support of the features of AMD64/EM64T architectures, 
> > especially SSE3.
> 
> It's David O'Brien and Kan's call, but I would recommend
> against the use of gcc 4.0.0.  GCC is in the process of
> (early) release of 4.0.1 due to serious bugs affecting
> compilation of C++ and KDE.

One definately would want to wait for a point release after a major GCC
version bump.  Same for anyone basing product on FreeBSD. :-)

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050619043711.GB46516>