Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:04:10 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: rcoleman@criticalmagic.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devd Message-ID: <20050621120334.Y26664@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20050620.201844.39131299.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20050619012425.L56734@fledge.watson.org> <20050620.124905.35871665.imp@bsdimp.com> <42B75C7D.2050103@criticalmagic.com> <20050620.201844.39131299.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > devd won't be rewritten to not use C++. That's a non-option. > : > : Out of curiosity, why is that? I have nothing against C++, but that > : stance seems surprising. I have not scanned the tree, but I was under > : the impression that very little of the base system that is written in C++. > > Because I wrote it, and I don't like stupid reasons to dictate a choice > of language. It will remain C++ because I'm a grumpy old man, ... At last, he admits the truth. :-) Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050621120334.Y26664>