Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:04:10 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        rcoleman@criticalmagic.com, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: devd
Message-ID:  <20050621120334.Y26664@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050620.201844.39131299.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20050619012425.L56734@fledge.watson.org> <20050620.124905.35871665.imp@bsdimp.com> <42B75C7D.2050103@criticalmagic.com> <20050620.201844.39131299.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> : > devd won't be rewritten to not use C++.  That's a non-option.
> :
> : Out of curiosity, why is that?  I have nothing against C++, but that
> : stance seems surprising.  I have not scanned the tree, but I was under
> : the impression that very little of the base system that is written in C++.
>
> Because I wrote it, and I don't like stupid reasons to dictate a choice 
> of language.  It will remain C++ because I'm a grumpy old man, ...

At last, he admits the truth. :-)

Robert N M Watson



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050621120334.Y26664>