Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:05:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: Memory modified after free Message-ID: <20050624150442.F83036@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20050624092723.GA4393@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20050624032731.T82841@odysseus.silby.com> <20050624092723.GA4393@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:29:42AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: >> >> Andrey, the use after free panic you reported sounds like it could be a >> use after free of a mbuf. What network interfaces do you have on your >> system, and what features are you using? (ipfw, netgraph, etc.) > > No ipfw, netgraph or anything complex. > > de0: flags=108843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffffff broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > ether 00:00:c0:f1:ef:d3 > media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP > status: active Ok, I'm going to spend a few minutes doing an inspection of if_de.c to see if I can find anything odd. Can anyone else with a de card confirm that whether their system now elicits similar panics or whether it's all good? Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050624150442.F83036>