Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:28:18 -0500 From: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: net/gnomemeeting maintainer <kwm@freebsd.org>, net/asterisk maintainer <sobomax@freebsd.org>, Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de>, ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org>, net/asterisk-oh323 maintainer <bamby@portaone.com>, Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com> Subject: Re: devel/pwlib and net/openh323 update coming Message-ID: <20050719152818.GA64202@energistic.com> In-Reply-To: <20050719155248.apdm04x2wwgo8wg0@netchild.homeip.net> References: <20050718175416.I72944@hades.admin.frm2> <20050719155248.apdm04x2wwgo8wg0@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:52:48PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de> wrote: > > >i spent a lot of time the past days/weeks to update the devel/pwlib > >and net/openh323 port to a more recent version. I haven't looked at the patches yet but I'm curious why you chose the versions you did? pwlib 1.9.0 is development branch (aka Atlas) as is openh323 1.17.1. (Although a new development release 1.9.1/1.17.2 was released today). I was shooting for getting the Stable (Mimas) release (currently 1.8.5/1.15.4 although another release is scheduled in about 2 weeks that has bug fixes in it from Atlas, some BSD specific). Did you have specific need of the Atlas branch? The PR I submitted only addresses pwlib and openh323. Your patch covers other ports which is great. I'd had a couple of patches (e.g. gatekeeper) to update to current version and utilize newer pwlib/openh323 but mainly was going to wait until pwlib/openh323 where in the tree. > >You can get it at: > >ftp://ftp.frm2.tum.de/pub/jpulz/FreeBSD/pwlib_openh323-20050719.patch > >The md5 checksum is: > >MD5 (pwlib_openh323-20050719.patch) = 889c6cce0824c25d96aa935c0cdb99b6 I'll take a look at these today or tomorrow. Koop is the go to guy at the moment. I believe he has a pthread concern that he's trying to solve before doing this update. Perhaps your patches already address that? -steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050719152818.GA64202>