Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:58:35 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make fetchindex doesn't honor FETCH_ENV Message-ID: <20050803115835.aovuzxnvxcc84wwk@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20050802172156.43ba96d6@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> References: <39224.212.155.220.106.1122975995.squirrel@webmail.openvisp.net> <20050802155055.78wkoaiggswg4cw4@netchild.homeip.net> <20050802172156.43ba96d6@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote: >> Looks good. I add it to my current fetchindex-patch and try to >> remember to commit it when the ports tree is unfrozen again. Feel >> free to bug me when I forget to commit it. > > Why doesn't this qualify to be committed during the freeze ? It fixes > an infrastructure issue. > > (I don't use fetchindex, I'm just curious why, for example a fix for > portupgrade has been committed but this one wouldn't) If someone wants to commit this fix: I'm fine (and I can handle the conflict it will create in my development version). But I don't have enough time in the time the ports freeze will probably last to commit it "now". Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Daemons did it
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050803115835.aovuzxnvxcc84wwk>