Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:19:25 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Gregg Cooper <bsdcrank@squbes.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports disconnected from category Makefiles Message-ID: <20050809211925.1bff720d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20050809211830.6335989f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <42F4F968.80600@squbes.com> <20050809033920.GA87042@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B328.4030305@squbes.com> <20050809134728.GA55529@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8B8D6.4040304@squbes.com> <20050809154342.GB88538@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8E398.9030003@squbes.com> <20050809172754.GA21952@xor.obsecurity.org> <42F8EA5E.80906@squbes.com> <20050809205522.3001aaad@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050809175846.GA22660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050809211830.6335989f@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:18:30 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:58:46 -0400 > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:55:22PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:39:42 -0400 > > > Gregg Cooper <bsdcrank@squbes.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > >>... what is a "more better" way to snatch as many ports as > > > > >>possible? > > > > > > > > > > Use make -k > > > > > > > > Excellent ... I was churning over in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > > > > thinking it would hold the key and never even thought to go look > > > > at make ... thanks! > > > > > > And if you really want to grab everything possible use: > > > make -k -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES -DTRY_BROKEN > > > > > > It also might make sense to run a few parallel fetch jobs; > > > especially on a slower/busy machine there's pretty much time spent > > > "non-fetching". > > > > I was going to suggest this but you'll run the risk of collisions > > between some of the ports that download the same distfiles, which > > may lead to corruption. > > True; after the fetch is finished run a make checksum (this is a good > idea for non-parallel fetch also). With the same arguments, of course make -k -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES -DTRY_BROKEN checksum -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050809211925.1bff720d>