Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:05:26 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: drvince@anonymnet.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: More into /etc/rc.d/jail Message-ID: <20050809220526.GD45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050809215939.GA15004@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <N1-uLBXxM-zn8@Safe-mail.net> <20050809214330.GZ45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050809215939.GA15004@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Brooks, > > This was recently discussed in some thread. The problem with this > > approach is that file backed md(4) devices are too slow to make it > > standard. This is why this won't go into FreeBSD, IMHO. > > Nonsense. Integrating support for mounting file backed MD file systems > at boot would be quite logical even if md(4) devices are slow. In a > large portion of cases, the overhead isn't relevent compared to the > administrative freedom granted by using files instead of partitions. Ok. Then Stefan Bethke's script (see his mail in this thread) might be a better solution since it is a more generic. However it is not explicitely bound to jails has initially requested, so a note in jail(8) manpage would be worth in this case. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050809220526.GD45385>