Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:48:39 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: sf@FreeBSD.org Cc: dejan.lesjak@ijs.si, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Needed: compat5x package Message-ID: <20050820.124839.106765801.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200508200056.j7K0ux3l089161@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20050820.060710.101601176.hrs@allbsd.org> <200508192334.28064.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200508200056.j7K0ux3l089161@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug_20_12_48_39_2005_852)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <200508200056.j7K0ux3l089161@freefall.freebsd.org>: sf> At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:07:10 +0900 (JST), sf> Hiroki Sato wrote: sf> > I am wondering if misc/localedata can be used---were the LC_* files sf> > architecture dependent at that time? I thought this incompatibility sf> > was needed to making them architecture independent. sf> > Do I misunderstand? sf> sf> The distfile tarball for misc/localedata port contains variety of sf> locale data for all architectures. This is because they are sf> incompatible each other at that time in spite of share/ hierarchy. I see. I was wrong about how the locale files were handled in misc/localedata. It should work fine. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug_20_12_48_39_2005_852)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDBqgXTyzT2CeTzy0RAugTAKC7ucfi6a+HQVUDyLS4VEphpUjV4gCbBygz mMp4H4eAq/DeO6DDcZEipBY= =BYFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug_20_12_48_39_2005_852)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050820.124839.106765801.hrs>