Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:29:10 -0500 From: Joe Auty <joe@netmusician.org> To: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about Portaudit and code freezes Message-ID: <DCEF4E5A-564C-4F10-AB30-C75C744F637B@netmusician.org> In-Reply-To: <20050825161224.GC10134@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <7F8BEA4C-2CD8-4744-88D4-B55FB029EC43@netmusician.org> <20050825161224.GC10134@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is Xpdf still listed in the portsaudit database as being vulnerable for you? portaudit -f /usr/ports/INDEX-5 If so, I guess there is nothing I can do except wait... I was just wondering if this has not been corrected because of the freeze? On Aug 25, 2005, at 11:12 AM, Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:23:11AM -0500, Joe Auty wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> How come xpdf is still showing up as a vulnerability, even though the >> latest portrevision was supposed to resolve these problems? Has the >> portaudit database not been updated because of the code freeze? >> > > Some other ports (like cups-base) incorporate part of the xpdf > code. so they will still show up as vulnerable. But I think that the > message shouldn't refer to xpdf. It's confusing. > > Roland > -- > R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as > plain text. > public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DCEF4E5A-564C-4F10-AB30-C75C744F637B>