Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:32:44 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which SCHED_ for DB server Message-ID: <43179DAC.2010102@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <20050901135131.GB3805@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <4316A5BC.1000405@meijome.net> <20050901075851.GA19900@intserv.int1.b.intern> <4316B906.50002@meijome.net> <20050901135131.GB3805@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # freebsd@meijome.net / 2005-09-01 18:17:10 +1000: > >>Holger Kipp wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >> >>>>4 x SATA 150 drives, 90% of it RAID5 with gvinum. >>> >>> >>>I do not know your applications, but if writing to disk is an issue: >>> >>>- WAL-files should be written to physically separated disks. >> >>sorry, what do you mean by WAL-files > > > Looks like you might greatly benefit from getting acquainted with > PostgreSQL first; you won't be able to tune anything if you don't > know how the software works. > touche. I've been reading from the documentation from their site and I haven't seen anything on the WAL files...google helped a lot ;) I think i'll go with 2 separate raid 1 instances given this information (and cross the bridge of more storage needed when I get to it). thanks!!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43179DAC.2010102>