Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:38:17 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bigger boot block size? Message-ID: <8350.1126341497@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:14:37 EDT." <200509091214.41429.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200509091214.41429.jkim@FreeBSD.org>, Jung-uk Kim writes: >Sigh... But bsdlabel(8) should be able to handle this case when '-B' >option is given and first partition of the slice is UFS1, i. e., we >keep 'historical' boot1/boot2 for a while and drop the support >later. ;-) Guys, bsdlabel has no future, we need to migrate to something that is A: 64 capable B: supports more than 7/8 partitions C: understands that metadata should not be exposed in-band. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8350.1126341497>