Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:43:58 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Mike Hunter <mhunter@ack.berkeley.edu>
Cc:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, "Ryan P. Sommers" <ryans@rpsommers.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Arne Schwabe <arne@rfc2549.org>, Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_hackers@webcom.it>
Subject:   Re: "Smart" Hubs
Message-ID:  <20050909204358.GC12395@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050909202849.GA46237@malcolm.berkeley.edu>
References:  <4321DDCA.8050902@rfc2549.org> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0509091539050.8605-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20050909202849.GA46237@malcolm.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:28:49PM -0700, Mike Hunter wrote:
> On Sep 09, "Daniel Eischen" wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> =20
> > > >I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find
> > > >a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always
> > > >go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports.
> > > >I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if
> > > >you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Or if you have 3 nics, use if_bridge. Or buy a really expensive manag=
ed
> > > switch, which allows you to mirror ports, vlans etc.
> >=20
> > Well, is $175.00 US expensive?  The Netgear FS726T can be had for
> > about that price, and according to Netgear's web site, will support
> > port monitoring.  A 24-port switch may not be small enough for you,
> > but if you look around enough, you might find something that is.
>=20
> I think it violates specifications, but how about a physical copper "tap",
> like a two-headed cable?  Has anybody ever tried something like this?
> Ethernet was designed in the days of shared media....

That would be what the link I posted earlier does.  With full-duplex
connections, you need two recieve lines to get traffic in both
directions, but it does in fact work.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDIfQNXY6L6fI4GtQRAv3kAJ9TE0Iq3PQ2Le9Hd0gYU8RK7njiBACeOYm6
+FeXlN5Iot4OALtT41iT4RQ=
=QSI6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050909204358.GC12395>