Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:05:41 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete" Message-ID: <20050923140541.GE25534@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20050923140140.GR72516@submonkey.net> References: <20050923135649.GD25534@heechee.tobez.org> <20050923140140.GR72516@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:56:49PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote: > > Any objections? > > Any benefit? What's the rationale? Convenience. > > --- route.8 13 Feb 2005 22:25:16 -0000 1.44 > > +++ route.8 23 Sep 2005 13:26:10 -0000 > > @@ -83,13 +83,15 @@ > > .Pp > > The > > .Nm > > -utility provides six commands: > > +utility provides seven commands: > > .Pp > > .Bl -tag -width Fl -compact > > .It Cm add > > Add a route. > > .It Cm flush > > Remove all routes. > > +.It Cm del > > +Delete a specific route. > > That's probably better spelled as "Alias for 'delete'". Yes, I agree, thanks. \Anton. -- An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions. -- Robert A. Humphrey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050923140541.GE25534>