Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:28:13 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Shadowed Files Message-ID: <20050929152813.GA1450@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20050928163600.C30755@seibercom.net> References: <20050928163600.C30755@seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:42:15PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote: > When running 'portsclean', this message is displayed: > > ** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /lib/libcrypto.so.3 > /lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.8 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) > > ** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.8 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) > > Would it be safe to delete the redundant library? I assume that I should > remove the /usr/lib/ version and not the /usr/local/lib version. > No one has jumped in with advice, so I'd like to know if you make any decision:: like mv'ing, say, /lib/libcrypto.so.3 to /lib/libcrypto.so.3.tmp and see what hits the fan. If anything. I'm working, carefully, on upgrading my three FBSD platforms and saw the same thing you have with portsclean. I also used libchk, but it didn't help very much. So I'm wondering too. (NOT to complain, but how does Linux/Ubuntulinux keep its systems free of excess libs?) gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050929152813.GA1450>