Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:55:18 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SENDMAIL_MC & making world Message-ID: <20051010115518.GC63395@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20051009082017.GB81198@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009171512.GA2523@flame.pc> <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:01:32PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> > Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> writes: > : On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:15:12PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > : > > : > I've always found __MAKE_CONF very useful, but it's not documented in > : > the ``obvious'' places (i.e. the manpage). I think I should add at > : > least a note about it in the manpage of make > : > : FWIW, we have make.conf(5) manpage already, and __MAKE_CONF seems > : to belong to it better than to make(1). make(1) xrefs make.conf(5) > : already. I think I can do the job if you are busy with something > : else currently. > > __MAKE_CONF should be documented in make(1) since it is in > /usr/share/mk/sys.mk and global to the entire system for all make jobs > (not just those controlled by buildworld). It should also be in > make.conf(5). Agreed. sys.mk is somewhere between make(1) and make.conf(5), so __MAKE_CONF belongs to both until we decide some day we need manpages for our *.mk files. And make.conf(5) contains an incorrect statement that /etc/make.conf applies to system builds only. I'll fix this. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051010115518.GC63395>