Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:04:36 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/87073: New article: Maintaining and contributing to the FreeBSD Ports Collection Message-ID: <20051010080436.2dd3aa28@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051010002221.GB11266@soaustin.net> References: <200510071804.j97I4jOD099219@freefall.freebsd.org> <20051009132205.6478a5fb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051009170105.GE22643@soaustin.net> <20051010025335.10d473ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20051010002221.GB11266@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 19:22:21 -0500 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:53:35AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > I'm thinking if we shouldn't impose documenting in PH the new things > > that go in bsd.*.mk's files (the things that are supposed to go in > > CHANGES). (don't commit if you don't document it in PH or at least > > provide a non-doc-book version so more proficient doc people can do > > it fast). > > Yeah, well, the rulemaking stuff can get pretty unpopular sometimes. > I'll settle for "suggest" for most stuff these days. Ah. so it depends of what side of the ruling process you are ? Never thought of that. :) And now that my partner is in Berlin for a week I'm left here doing more ruling that my usual; I guess it became a learned habit. :) > Patches welcome btw :-) A lot of work is needed here. Promise to send when I crash my head against something that's not in PH. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051010080436.2dd3aa28>