Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:00:41 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability Message-ID: <CDEF9AB2-5655-4615-B8B9-D71A61F3B3E0@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <200510202217.07999.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <20051019231046.1136a1ea.dick@nagual.st> <57B3E41C-8880-4ED4-B33C-321DE5ED9AD1@khera.org> <200510202217.07999.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 20, 2005, at 4:16 PM, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday, 20. October 2005 21:20, Vivek Khera wrote: > > >> personally, I don't see the point of doing that. just let your ports >> naturally get replaced as they are upgraded due to version bumps and >> such. >> > > That is dangerous, see other replies in this thread for the reasons > why. I stand corrected; you need to update any provider of shared object libs at the minimum. Probably also any consumer of those shared objects too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CDEF9AB2-5655-4615-B8B9-D71A61F3B3E0>