Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:46:45 -0500 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: Jochen Gensch <incmc@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Filesystem panic - one hd inaccessable under 6-STABLE Message-ID: <20051105014645.GB37350@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <200511042251.33902.incmc@gmx.de> References: <200511042023.36498.incmc@gmx.de> <436BBB1C.1030900@centtech.com> <20051104212757.GD4813@cicely12.cicely.de> <200511042251.33902.incmc@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:51:33PM +0100, Jochen Gensch wrote: > Am Freitag 04 November 2005 22:27 schrieb Bernd Walter: > > > If you have the filesystem on a slice (e.g. da0s1) and not a partition > > (e.g. da0s1e) it shouldn't be an UFS one. > > I simply use the whole harddrive without subdividing partitions. Why souldn't > that slice be ufs? > > > > Then check with disklabel da0s1 what partitions you have and use the > > 4.2BSD ones. > > disklabel da0s1 > # /dev/da0s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 320159322 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > > > As you can see, nothing left. However I don't know what it looked like before. > I was able to mount da0s1 directly, so maybe there wasn't any partition > anyway since I used the entire disk at once (I'm not that used to filesystem > issues)? Well then da0s1 wouldn't have a disklabel. So try fsck_ufs -b 160 on /dev/da0s1 itself? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051105014645.GB37350>