Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:14:22 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poor fdc(4) performance Message-ID: <20051112161422.GB1485@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20051112074418.GE18405@rndsoft.co.kr> References: <20051112071815.GD18405@rndsoft.co.kr> <20051112073711.GE39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20051112074418.GE18405@rndsoft.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:44:18PM +0900 I heard the voice of Pyun YongHyeon, and lo! it spake thus: > > Yes, it could be. But I think the machine is fast enough to read > sequential blocks. Try running it without SMP. There may be enough happening in the MP locking bit that you end up falling behind. I remember noticing crap fdc performance (without larger block sizes) on my dual PPro a little while back. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051112161422.GB1485>