Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:26:35 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Integrated DEBUG related macros to WITH_DEBUG/WITHOUT_DEBUG Message-ID: <200511131126.45107.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051113100335.GE69544@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <200511130038.jAD0cgLb043746@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <200511131007.35678.lofi@freebsd.org> <20051113100335.GE69544@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2627422.XEm0irZvGm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 13. November 2005 11:03, Stijn Hoop wrote: > I disagree with waiting to disambiguate options until it is > available, but this is just my opinion (looking through either 'make > config-recursive' or ports Makefiles isn't my idea of fun as I'm sure > it isn't yours). Converting WANT_QT_DEBUG to WITH_DEBUG is the contrary of disambiguation,=20 which is why I object to it. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart2627422.XEm0irZvGm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDdxTlXhc68WspdLARAo0uAKCB9PFl7gjmH1GaB8xIVkyd6tRDAQCeOyu8 sm9Hycj2Szh2Hs7znB6ioQc= =GuYt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2627422.XEm0irZvGm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511131126.45107.lofi>