Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:38:01 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Craig Boston <craig@yekse.gank.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3? Message-ID: <c21e92e20511142338o3c7c43e0k8fef33a042803bdd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511142311.51781.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com> <200511142259.45090.ringworm01@gmail.com> <c21e92e20511142317t4d192692n28d169aa73e6bbb2@mail.gmail.com> <200511142311.51781.ringworm01@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/15/05, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.com> wrote:
> portmanager security/amavisd-new
>
> It should keep things focused to just what is relevent to security/amavis=
d-new
> I don't see any xorg dependencies in their, do you?
>
> -Mike
Ok, I *manually* removed amavisd-new *and* p5-BerkeleyDB and rebuilt
them manually. Now portmanager handle them correctly while portupgrade
still chokes. +1 for portmanager, maybe I'll just stick to it.
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20511142338o3c7c43e0k8fef33a042803bdd>