Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:21:33 +0100 From: Jon Otterholm <jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se> To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp-proxy Message-ID: <1132582893.1411.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20051121130046.GA22502@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20051110124903.GB67086@uk.tiscali.com> <1131629107.878.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117135738.GH5197@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1132239963.819.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117152357.GA8209@uk.tiscali.com> <1132242723.819.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117162748.GA8417@uk.tiscali.com> <20051117173535.GF97528@gremlin.foo.is> <20051121112856.GB21985@uk.tiscali.com> <1132577145.1411.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051121130046.GA22502@uk.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think they do that when using standard 802.1Q, but for some reason theey don't when running QinQ... /Jon On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:00 +0000, Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote: > > The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLANs is that one mac > > cannot end up mapped to more than one port in the switches FDB. If they > > do - we get something called "host-flapping" on IOS-language. > > Or put it another way - Cisco haven't properly virtualised their VLANs so > that they have separate forwarding tables.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1132582893.1411.21.camel>