Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:39:27 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports? Message-ID: <43A36C4F.4010005@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> <20051217000418.GC851@zaphod.nitro.dk> <43A35FA5.4050202@FreeBSD.org> <20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Better use:
> USE_RC_SUBR= ike
> and put the script in files/ike.in
>
> Currently this will perform some substitutions on the script (PREFEIX,
> etc.) and install it as ike.sh
Thanks for that, I wasn't aware that a .in vs. .sh.in was already working :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A36C4F.4010005>