Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:10:50 +0200
From:      Vaida Bogdan <vaida.bogdan@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Cc:        Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: fujitsu siemens no sound driver in sndstat
Message-ID:  <12848a3b0512210410k7924b81fvf3dfb865e6684069@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051221125056.lx7xlyu1c0wgccww@netchild.homeip.net>
References:  <20051220162205.P90277@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <12848a3b0512201448x41196cd8o65616358485d119@mail.gmail.com> <20051221104847.N64938@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20051221125056.lx7xlyu1c0wgccww@netchild.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I heard (on some forum) someone tried an implementation on CURRENT...
and I am also wondering about the difficuly of porting the drivers
from netbsd...
Has anyone tried that?

On 12/21/05, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote:
> Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> wrote:
>
> > for that engine, our haven't yet. Also, I don't like Intel's police
> > to license all HDA implementations, read
> >
> >       http://www.intel.com/standards/hdaudio/
> >
> >    Implementation of the High Definition Audio Specification requires a
> >    license from Intel. Contributors to the High Definition Audio
> >    Specification have signed the High Definition Audio (Azalia)
> >    Developers Agreement and have provided input to the specification
> >    under the terms outlined in that agreement. Implementers that have
> >    signed the High Definition Audio Specification (Azalia) Adopter
> >    Agreement are licensed to produce products based on the specificatio=
n
> >    under a reciprocal, royalty-free license to certain intellectual
> >    property rights from Intel and other Contributors and Adopters for
> >    their products that are compliant with the licensed versions of the
> >    High Definition Audio Specification.
> >
> >  It sounds somehow restrictive, doesn't it? But NetBSD people have done=
 it,
> > so I think FreeBSD people should be able to do it also.
>
> I haven't reread it today, but at the time I read this for the first time=
 I
> did understand it as someone needs a license if he implements a device wh=
ich
> provides this interface, it's not about software which uses this interfac=
e.
>
> But I'm not a lawyer...
>
> Bye,
> Alexander.
>
> --
> http://www.Leidinger.net  Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
> http://www.FreeBSD.org     netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID =3D 72077137
> It's OBVIOUS ... The FURS never reached ISTANBUL ... You were an EXTRA
> in the REMAKE of "TOPKAPI" ... Go home to your WIFE ... She's making
> FRENCH TOAST!
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12848a3b0512210410k7924b81fvf3dfb865e6684069>