Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:51:27 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, Spadge <spadge@fromley.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Lapin <slapinid@gmail.com> Subject: Re: problems with heimdal Message-ID: <04962336@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060119064451.GA65173@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:44:51 -0500") References: <48239d390601180746x4c75ff45l2ef00a0300cedfb7@mail.gmail.com> <43CE65DD.2080305@fromley.net> <96010585@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060118211054.1a309bc3@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <97763707@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060119064451.GA65173@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:44:51 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:40:52AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:10:54 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:19:18 +0300
> > > Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote:
> >
> > > > 2. System kerberos libraries doesn't have information about linked
> > > > libraries (look at output of "ldd /usr/lib/libgssapi.so"). Thus
> > > > we have some trouble (modern mozilla's applications, recall
> > > > problems with postgesql port and for sure there are some more).
> >
> > > The maintainer of the in-tree kerberos stuff said it's a problem of the
> > > application then (in the discussion of the postgresql problem). Did you
> > > tried to talk with him?
> >
> > No. It seems to me that non-storing information about linked libraries
> > is not a standard way (what other applications do it?). Hence, the
> > maintainer have had a serious arguments to do so. And I have nothing
> > to do but look for a warkaround and share it with the community.
> Actually I think the /usr/lib/libgssapi.so way *is* standard for
> FreeBSD. What counterexamples can you find?
$ ldd /usr/lib/libssh.so
/usr/lib/libssh.so:
libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28181000)
libgssapi.so.8 => /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8 (0x28191000)
libkrb5.so.8 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.8 (0x2819f000)
libasn1.so.8 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.8 (0x281d3000)
libcom_err.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.3 (0x281f4000)
libmd.so.3 => /lib/libmd.so.3 (0x281f6000)
libroken.so.8 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.8 (0x28204000)
libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x28210000)
libcrypt.so.3 => /lib/libcrypt.so.3 (0x28302000)
Looking at "ldd /usr/lib/*.so" gives much more. I thought that others
(without output) were self-containing.
Well, I may be wrong about the standard way. Am I?
WBR
--
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04962336>