Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:01:50 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@galgenberg.net> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org> Cc: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults periodic.conf Message-ID: <20060201170150.GE1095@galgenberg.net> In-Reply-To: <20060130220455.GD91655@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200601301923.k0UJNO07018885@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060130220455.GD91655@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 30 January 2006 at 19:23:24 +0000, Matteo Riondato wrote: > > Log: > > Make df output more consistent: > > Remove -k now that -h is present > > I'm really not happy with this change. I can appreciate that many > people like -h, but is it a majority? I don't know, but I'm pretty sure, that people using df -h are the ones that *don't* bother reading periodic mails. *I* do read them, and I really like -k or -m to be the default. If people want -h, they can still edit their periodic.conf. Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060201170150.GE1095>