Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:22:23 -0500 From: "Rong-En Fan" <grafan@gmail.com> To: "Jason Evans" <jasone@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New jemalloc patch (was Re: KDE 3.5.0 seems much chubbier than 3.4.2) Message-ID: <6eb82e0603162122h658be7a5he4b01a258ce4541b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200603141056.58397.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200601301652.16237.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200602201040.48083.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <440D2D86.3000802@FreeBSD.org> <200603141056.58397.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/13/06, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 17:21, Jason Evans wrote: > [ snip ] > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/patches/jemalloc_20060306a.d= iff > > > > See the man page in the patch for runtime configuration options. > > > > Here's the C file: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/patches/jemalloc_20060306a.c > > > > I'm primarily interested in feedback regarding the following: > > > > * Stability > > * Speed > > * Memory usage > > I have been running it for the last few days and have not seen any stabil= ity > or excess memory consumption issues. I used this for 2+ days on up-to-date -current. Memory usage is much lower than before. I have 512MB memory, running Xorg, firefox with many tabs, several rxvt-unicode, mplayer. Without this patch, after one day, it begins to swapping heavily. I didn't do any benchmark on speed. At least, I does not feel any slowness compared to w/o patch. Thanks, Rong-En Fan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6eb82e0603162122h658be7a5he4b01a258ce4541b>