Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 01:53:05 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: CVS messages for FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project <cnproj-cvs@lists.cn.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [cnproj-cvs] About (PDF)JADETEX_PREPROCESS Message-ID: <20060408175305.GA1495@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <200604081141.k38Bfmaa013086@zhao.intron.ac> References: <200604081141.k38Bfmaa013086@zhao.intron.ac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:40:17PM +0800, intron@intron.ac wrote: > Hi, > JADETEX_PREPROCESS and PDFJADETEX_PREPROCESS which you have just > added into doc.docbook.mk and doc.project.mk are really excellent for > CJK documents. At the same time, between JadeTeX preprocessor and > Jade postprocessor, which do you think is better? I think that I did not really get your idea, would you please explain a bit more? Cheers,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060408175305.GA1495>