Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 -0700 From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port Message-ID: <20060715040705.GF33499@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060505014315.GB22804@soaustin.net> References: <200605050000.k4500blB001868@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060505014315.GB22804@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 04/05/2006, Jo Rhett wrote: > > I'm highly amused that I would be asked to make some changes, when > > the request for said changes requires more typing than making the > > changes. This is what, 41 characters different? On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:43:15PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > Some maintainers object, vociferously, to any change made to their ports > without their approval. Therefore, the default policy is that maintainers > need to be asked, because it is too difficult to remember which maintainers > will complain and which won't. This is a classical case of "damned if you > do, damned if you don't." I'm not certain we're talking about the same thing. Bouncing a patch back to me for a 12-character replacement seemed silly. -- Jo Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060715040705.GF33499>