Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:41:06 -0300 From: "Renato Botelho" <rbgarga@gmail.com> To: "Yuan, Jue" <yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports structure and improvement suggestions Message-ID: <747dc8f30605090941n2b133099pe0ba35ddd4ae646a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200605100037.08447.yuanjue@yuanjue.net> References: <20060508200926.GA6005@daemons.gr> <200605100037.08447.yuanjue@yuanjue.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/9/06, Yuan, Jue <yuanjue02@gmail.com> wrote: > Have got a question for the OPTIONS Framework. > > Since it will putting KNOBS in /etc/make.conf, the problem is: > when one port put "WITH_X11=3Dyes" into make.conf, while later another > port may put "WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes" into the same file. So when the ports > tree are upgraded and building process for these two ports happens, > as far as I can see, there are still some difficulties to tell which KNOB= is > for which port, right? > > I am not saying it is unresolved. Many solutions I have seen are mentione= d > here. But it is not what the OPTIONS Framework does automatically ;-) So > using the OPTIONS Framework only may not be a complete solution for ports= , > from this point of view :-) Try solution proposed by flz@FreeBSD.org in this thread... -- Renato Botelho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?747dc8f30605090941n2b133099pe0ba35ddd4ae646a>