Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:44:33 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Cc: carlos.paniago@gmail.com Subject: Re: OO2 and AMD64 Message-ID: <200605112144.35270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512.094931.39173693.chat95@mac.com> References: <4462D8CF.7040903@panix.homeunix.org> <20060512.094931.39173693.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 11 May 2006 08:49 pm, NAKATA Maho wrote: > Hi, > > In Message-ID: <4462D8CF.7040903@panix.homeunix.org> > > "Carlos F. A. Paniago" <carlos.paniago@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maho and People: Does someone knows about OO2.0.2 and AMD64? All > > the > > Recently Jan Holesovsky, Caolan, Pavel did a great work for AMD64 > see http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/ > I think 2.0.3 includes almost all patches needed for GNU/Linux > AMD64. > > Carlos Eduardo donated FBSD amd64 access for me(even though > I own two opteron boxes which are used in my research). > I'm currently working for that. However, I'm bit busy in these > days, please do not expect very soon availability. > I don't think ooo-build is good for me. We must take care of > the same FBSD patch at different place (both ports and ooo-build) > it complicates the porting process, so thats why > I'm working at openoffice.org-2.0-devel. I was secretly working on it for a week now. ;-) My highly experimental patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/OOo20-m167.diff It has some rough edges, so you may have to intervene build process. I am updating this patch against m168 now. Cheers, Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605112144.35270.jkim>